Tell TranBC

Tell TranBCWhat Do You Want to Know More About?

Are you looking for something on TranBC but can’t find it?

Or have a question about what the ministry does and why we do it?

Share your question with us and we’ll try to get you an answer.

Who knows – your question could be our next blog!

Thank you – we couldn’t do this without YOU.

Tags: , , , , ,

1,129 Responses to Tell TranBC

  1. Doug Bozzard on November 15, 2018 at 6:13 pm

    I’ve been driving the coquihalla Hwy 5 days a week for the past 6 years. The biggest problem I see is that the plow trucks aren’t doing there job keeping the Hwy clean or put dirt down for traction. There has been may times I’ve put chains on & drove up the hill & I see VSA sitting in the brake check doing nothing. When the toll booth was there the road was always in good shape because the government ran it. I think they should maybe look at getting a different company to look after the road maintenance.

  2. Max on November 14, 2018 at 5:13 pm

    Congratulations on implementing the NO TRUCKS IN THE LEFT LANE pilot program!!! What a great day for Coquihalla drivers. I drive this highway frequently and have seen first hand the prevalence of reckless driving by commercial truckers. I know time is money for them, but it is government’s job to ensure their rush isn’t causing accidents, deaths and delays for the rest of the public.

    I hope MOT will even consider further steps:

    1) Implement NO TRUCKS IN LEFT LANE on all highways
    2) Limit commercial trucks maximum speed to 90km/h on all highways

    Thanks again for taking the Coquihalla driving statistics seriously and doing something about it!

    • tranbceditor on November 15, 2018 at 4:28 pm

      Thanks for your comment, Max. This is a pilot program, with other select routes to possibly follow. We do not, however, endorse differential speed limits. Studies show different speed limits for cars and trucks increase the potential for rear end, weaving, and passing crashes.

  3. Tim Yzerman on November 9, 2018 at 4:33 pm

    The multi-use path that leads from Nordel Way to the Alex Fraser bridge is in really bad condition. The trail frequently floods right by the rail overpass and trail users need to navigate water that can be up to 2 feet deep. Typically with almost any moderate rain event the trail floods with water that is 6-8″ deep. This trail is the only connection with North Delta and the Alex Fraser Bridge. It needs to be raised ASAP. The pathway behind Planet Ice is heaving due to roots uplifting the path and there is additional ponding. The pathway also floods frequently beside the truck weigh scale. Can the ministry spend some money to maintain this trail and improve it?

    • tranbceditor on November 13, 2018 at 12:51 pm

      Hello Tim – thanks for your comment. We have shared it forward with local area staff for review.

    • tranbceditor on November 14, 2018 at 4:03 pm

      Hi Tim,

      We will investigate the heaving and ponding issues to determine what can be done in the short term. Thank you for bringing these issues to our attention.

  4. Harry Payne on November 7, 2018 at 9:18 pm

    Hello I Have Question.

    1. What Years the Racing River Bridge Built?
    2. is this Racing River Bridge has only metal deck?

    Thank you.

    • tranbceditor on November 9, 2018 at 3:36 pm

      Hello Harry!

      We have sent your question to our bridge engineers. Stay tuned for a response.

    • tranbceditor on November 9, 2018 at 3:54 pm

      Hello again Harry!

      The portion of Hwy 97 north of Fort St John and Fort Nelson where racing River is located is not within our jurisdiction. We suggest you contact Canada Public Works in Fort Nelson for more information. Thanks!

  5. Robin on November 7, 2018 at 1:21 pm

    Not so much a comment but a question … I am curious as to where to find or if you could provide me with the statistics of accidents that occurred on the stretch of highway between Salmon Arm and Kamloops the last few years…
    Thank you

    • tranbceditor on November 9, 2018 at 3:36 pm

      Hello Robin – ICBC collects that data from the BC RCMP. We encourage you to connect directly with then on your question.

  6. Sara Golling on November 7, 2018 at 9:50 am

    Re: Highway 3-B from the junction at Nancy Greene Lake to Rossland–
    The speed limit there was raised from 90 km/hr to 100 km/hr a while ago.
    There may not have been an appreciable increase in reported crashes or single-vehicle mishaps, but there has been a HUGE increase in the number of small birds killed on the road in the winter. They settle in flocks to “gravel up” and they have no chance to evade cars going at 100 km, or more (as is usual) along the straight stretches.
    The road has also seen a few bear fatalities and deer fatalities from car impacts recently.
    It seems an odd stretch of highway to have a 100-km speed limit anyway — it has several sharp curves, many cyclists using the highway there in the non-snow season, and in the snow season the road is not suitable for 100 km anyway. At Nancy Greene Summit (Strawberry Pass) there are two parking areas in heavy use, with pedestrians and dogs crossing the highway to access ski / snowshoe trails on the other side. Recreationists also park at other areas along that section of 3-B.
    I ask that you consider lowering the speed limit from Nancy Greene Lake to Rossland.
    100 km/hr is just not sensible for that stretch.

    • tranbceditor on November 9, 2018 at 3:52 pm

      Hi there Sara – thanks for your comment. We have sent it to our traffic engineers and wildlife biologist for review.

  7. Greg on November 3, 2018 at 11:42 am

    Hello, I had written a previous note about habitat in the median and roundabout of highways and what the Ministry is does about that or policy they have. I can’t find my post and didn’t receive any personal email regarding this. Could you forward my inquiry to the applicable dept/staff and have them get in touch with me. Thank you

    • tranbceditor on November 5, 2018 at 11:11 am

      HI Greg – that’s strange. We posted a response to you on August 16, 2018 at 3:37 pm. Here is the response again below:

      Hello Greg – sorry for the delay in getting this response to you.

      The ministry’s rights of way are very much part of the transportation system.Our maintenance contractors have a set schedule of mowing etc (you might want to get the wording from Maintenance Branch) to ensure that vegetation growth does not impact sight distances or encroach on the actual road way.

      Vegetation along roadside can also be a wildlife attractant which can lead to wildlife vehicle interactions (accidents). We changed our seed mix for r-o-w so we didn’t attract bears and large ungulates and successfully reduced the problem.

      Highway rights of way are recognized as a major pathway for invasive plant spread, and are often the starting point for infestations found in adjacent pastures, forests and environmentally sensitive areas so our staff and contractors mitigate the spread of invasive plants by implementing best practices aimed at prevention and control.

      The Environmental Enhancement Fund (EEF) established in 2003, invests $2 million annually to restore, protect and enhance environmental resources with direct benefits to the provincial highway infrastructure, projects, safety, maintenance and operations including:
      o Fish and wildlife passage improvements and restoration at stream and animal crossings at MoT roads, including culvert retrofits and replacements to restore pacific salmon and trout access to underutilized habitat and installation of wildlife tunnels.
      o Fish, wildlife and ecosystem habitat restoration and enhancement including construction of salmon and trout rearing habitat and spawning channels, water storage to create wetlands or aquatic habitat and to augment low (summer) streamflows, habitat complexing, restoration of highway footprint impacts and estuary and riparian planting enhancements
      o Other fish and wildlife conservation measures such as fishway installations, transplants to restore native fish and game populations, large wildlife relocation and installation of ungulate exclusion fencing and small wildlife crossing structures.

      Here’s our link to a lot of our publications, guidelines, policies etc. http://www.th.gov.bc.ca/publications/eng_publications/eng_pubs.htm

      If you have any more questions, please don’t hesitate to contact us. Thanks!

  8. Ian W on October 28, 2018 at 11:15 pm

    when you go to:
    http://images.drivebc.ca/bchighwaycam/pub/html/www/index-LowerMainland.html
    and click on the “Connect with us on TranBC” (https://tranbc.ca,
    you are presented with the following browser warning:

    tranbc.ca uses an invalid security certificate.
    The certificate is only valid for the following names: *.th.gov.bc.ca, th.gov.bc.ca
    Error code: SSL_ERROR_BAD_CERT_DOMAIN

    Clicking through the warnings, also results in a 404, Not Found
    Evidently https://tranbc.ca does not auto redirect to https://www.tranbc.ca; they are different.

    Please have your IT people address

    • tranbceditor on October 29, 2018 at 1:30 pm

      Thanks for letting us know Ian. We have had our webcam guy look into it and it should be fixed very soon.

  9. Ian W on October 28, 2018 at 11:09 pm

    What’s going on (or off) with the traffic cams for the North Shore at:
    http://images.drivebc.ca/bchighwaycam/pub/html/www/index-LowerMainland.html

    It’s been weeks since the North Shore (Lion’s Gate / Marine Dr and Ironworker’s/Cassiar have been on-line. Did Mainroad hide the keys as part of their contract renegotiation? There’s serious issues nearly every day on these bridges; the residents of, and visitors to the North Shore need to know what’s going on across these vital links to “Rest of the world”. Please bring them back on-line ASAP.

    Are the live feeds to the Monitoring Center still working? I understand other than the “replay the day”, the video is only real-time and not retained. Does MOTI use any video processing software to help them detect slow conditions, stalls, collisions or other issues or does it rely solely on human scanning ?

    While we’re discussing the cams, there are cameras located at the Fern St overpass, Lynn Creek bridge and the base of “the cut”, all of which are points of daily backup and congestion. When is MOTI going to make those cameras available on-line? They provide far greater insight to traffic conditions than the Lonsdale/Westview cams.

    Finally, is there any way to refresh the images faster than every 2 minutes, say every 30 seconds? It’s just so hard to judge how slowly things are moving when the refresh interval is so slow. The images are tiny (~20KB), so it can’t be a space issue.

    Thanks!

    • tranbceditor on October 29, 2018 at 4:18 pm

      Hi Ian,

      Breaking your comment down into four questions, we have the following information for you:

      1. Why have the North bridges (LGB and IWMB) and Hwy 1 east to Port Mann cams been down for so long?

      We are aware of the issue and techs continue to work on it. The system that feeds the images from these specific cams to the BC HwyCam servers is undergoing remediation which is also tied in with the Regional Transportation Management Centre (RTMC) systems, so the tech are working carefully to avoid disruptions to critical RTMC systems.

      2. How does RTMC detect congestion?

      We don’t use video detection, yet. Our folks at the RTMC use video feeds from the cams to monitor traffic flow and congestion.

      3. Construction cams (Lower Lynn Improvements Project) –can we make them BC HwyCams?

      No, not at present because the Fern Street overpass are temporary cameras that Project Managers use to monitor the project and traffic flow through the construction areas.

      4. Can we get the cams to refresh more frequently?

      The best solution would be streaming video, which we are considering in the near future. While we’re not convinced that 30 second refresh would tell us much more than we can see with the 1 or 2 minute refresh, we’d consider a 30 second refresh for some cameras. Suggestions?

  10. Steve Robertson on October 25, 2018 at 5:16 pm

    Hello I am trying to contract the company that mows the brush on the side of the roads with a hydraulic arm mounted on a John Deere grader. I have that same model of grader for sale and thought they might be interested.
    Any help appreciated.

  11. Kathy Martel on October 14, 2018 at 6:20 pm

    I was hoping to bring up a conversation about the variable speed corridor and just general highway speed. I feel that the speed for cars, trucks and semi’s should be different as they have done in some USA states. I just don’t feel a logging truck should be able to do the same speed limit as a car. I’m sure there is data that shows that they cannot slow down, or take a corner as fast as a car. I travel the highways quite frequently and very large trucks are in the passing lane constantly going very fast.
    Thank you for taking the time to read my comments.
    Kathy Martel

    • tranbceditor on October 18, 2018 at 11:55 am

      Hi Kathy – thank you for your comment. We have sent your question to our contact in the CVSE for review and response. We’ll let you know what we hear back.

    • tranbceditor on October 18, 2018 at 5:19 pm

      Hello Kathy – thanks for connecting with us here.

      We shared your concern with the CVSE and our traffic engineers. They let us know that the ministry supports the idea that the safest road is where vehicles all travel at the same speed, where speed differentials are minimized. When speeds are the same, passing maneuvers are minimized, and the ongoing weaving on multi-laned highways is minimized. That said, it should also be noted that BC does have a few truck speed limits in place where the limit differs from the one posted for passenger cars. These occur where we have a relatively long and steep downhill grade where the is a traffic signal at the bottom of the hill. We hope that this helps answer your question. Thanks again for connecting with us here.

  12. Nick Thomas on October 10, 2018 at 12:33 pm

    Does the Ministry of Transportation have any response to the recent report ‘Road Safety Impact of Increased Rural Highway Speed Limits in British Columbia, Canada’

    The report’s conclusion states:- Following the increase in rural highway speed limits in British Columbia, there was a marked deterioration in road safety on the affected roads. The number of fatal crashes more than doubled (118% increase) on roads with higher speed limits. Affected roads also had a 43% increase in total auto-insurance claims and a 30% increase in auto-insurance claims for injuries due to crashes… Based on our findings, we recommend that British Columbia roll back the 2014 speed limit increases. Future speed limits should be set in accordance with the safe systems approach and not based on the 85th percentile of summer travel speed. Other jurisdictions, especially those with harsh winter climates or with highways that traverse mountainous terrain, should learn from this experience and resist pressure from pro speed advocates to raise speed limits without due consideration of road safety.

    • tranbceditor on October 10, 2018 at 3:23 pm

      Hello again Nick,

      Based on the 2014 Rural Safety and Speed Review, the ministry introduced new technologies, strengthened legislation, raised driving penalties, and increased speed limits on 33 sections of highways based on a detailed engineering review of each section.

      The speed limit changes were made based on a careful and thorough engineering assessment using speed zoning practices recommended by the Institute of Transportation Engineers and adopted by road authorities throughout North America.

      In 2016, ministry engineers spent six months taking a close look at the first year of speed and crash data for each section of highway where we increased speed limits. Based on this data, the ministry implemented safety features including; improved road markings, better signage, new rumble strips, variable speed signs and wildlife safety measures and rolled back the speed limit changes on two sections of highway – Highway 1 from Hope to Cache Creek and on Highway 5A from Princeton to Merritt. 19 of the 33 segments showed a reduction or no change in collision rates. On the remaining segments the ministry implemented safety features including; improved road markings, better signage, new rumble strips, variable speed signs and wildlife safety measures.

      The ministry also rolled back the speed limit changes on two sections of highway – Highway 1 from Hope to Cache Creek and on Highway 5A from Princeton to Merritt. The ministry has begun analysis now that three years’ worth of data is available. Based on the results of this analysis, the ministry will consider all options for each of the 33 sections where speed limits were increased, including a potential reduction where appropriate.

      • Nick Thomas on October 10, 2018 at 5:46 pm

        One other factor that you should think about is fuel consumption. With the latest IPCC call for reductions in greenhouse gas emissions you should remember that any reduction in speed means a more than proportional decrease in carbon emissions.

  13. Jennifer on October 8, 2018 at 12:01 pm

    I am very concerned about the number of accidents that are occurring (almost daily or sometimes even multiple times/day) heading east on the Upper Levels Highway at the bend going into the Capilano Bridge. These seem to occur primarily when the surface of the pavement is wet. I have lived on the north shore since 1985 and there have NEVER been so many accidents at this bend. People are going too fast for the spot and the conditions. There is a big lit up sign showing that the bend is 60km/hr but evidently many do not slow down and lose control when they enter the bend. Poorly trained drivers, distracted drivers, cars with bald tires??? I don’t know, BUT, something needs to be done about this. I was in touch with Mike Farnworth’s office with an email suggesting photo radar there or putting rumble strips in. The province is seriously negligent on this issue as nothing is being done to prevent all these accidents. Personally, I think the surface of the highway should be changed with rumble strips (type they put on secondary routes in Alberta leading up to stop signs) as they seriously slow the driver down in an instinctive manner – you can’t help but slow down!)

    At this point in time, you cannot blame the former government as you have had plenty of time to do something that would increase road safety. It is now likely the #1 spot for accidents which could be prevented if anyone cared, which it seems that no one does as shown by the lack of enforcement and road changes.

    • tranbceditor on October 12, 2018 at 2:24 pm

      Hi Jennifer – thank you for your comment.

      Safety is our first priority and we are always looking at all ways we can increase safety on all of our highway networks.

      The ministry has made improvements to the eastbound approach of the Capilano Bridge by installing illuminated chevron signs which highlight the sharp curve. We have reduced the speed limit through this section to 80 km/h and have also installed an oversized sharp curve left sign with slow to 60 km/h tab warning drivers to reduce their speed through this curve. We will discuss the incidents with our engineering staff, to see if they have any further suggestions to warn drivers to slow prior to entering the curve. Thanks again for connecting with us, we hope that this helps with some of your concern.

  14. Kraig on October 3, 2018 at 11:27 am

    The Port Mann Bridge Coquitlam Exit lanes need fixing. A brand new bridge that already has back up problems to 176th with no accident is absurd. There are so many people who are using the Coquitlam Exit lanes (Exit 44) to try to bypass some traffic at the Cape Horn Interchange, due to the easy access back onto the highway from these exit lanes. This not only causes the backup for the Exit 44, but also further compounds the problem at Cape Horn due to all of these vehicles having to re-merge at that point. This reentry lane needs to be blocked off during rush hour to prevent this from happening – similar to how the Pattullo Bridge has an on-ramp closed during rush hour to promote traffic flow.

    Thanks.

    • tranbceditor on October 3, 2018 at 2:52 pm

      Hello Kraig and thank you for this comment. We have shared it with the local area office for review.

    • tranbceditor on October 5, 2018 at 3:55 pm

      Hi Kraig. Thanks again for your comment. We shared your concern with the local office staff who let us know that the lanes mentioned are not re-entry lanes, they are the Highway 7 westbound on ramp to Highway 1 westbound and cannot be limited as this would deny access to the Port Mann/ Highway 1 for residents from Coquitlam, Port Coquitlam, Pitt Meadows and Maple Ridge. The Port Mann Highway 1 corridor has seen a very high increase in volume taking traffic from Pattullo, Golden Ears and even some from the Alex Fraser Bridge with the removal of the toll. We are working on corridor improvements wherever possible to resolve volume concerns.

  15. Matt Rhoney on October 2, 2018 at 11:07 am

    Good morning, 

    I hope my email finds you well. I noticed that you published content that your readers can easily engage with and helpful resources, particularly icbc.com; which is why I wanted to let you know about a resource that I believe you would be interested in including on your website that utilized this very source. 

    This resource takes an in-depth look at some of the most dangerous intersections in Vancouver and the surrounding area. The resource allows users to find out how safe their neighborhood ranks with hard data and includes some helpful safety tips. Hoping you would consider adding this resource to your website
    Would you be willing to take a look and consider sharing with your online viewers to promote safety and awareness? If needed, I can provide a write up to go with the resource. I appreciate your time and look forward to chatting with you soon.

    Thank you,
    Matt Rhoney

    • tranbceditor on October 2, 2018 at 2:04 pm

      Good afternoon Matt and thank you for your comment. Unfortunately, we are unable to link out to third party websites. You might try connecting with the City of Vancouver about your initiative and see if they are interested in sharing your information.

  16. Ian McEwen on September 29, 2018 at 7:02 pm

    Good Evening,

    I have noticed numerous road rage situations while travelling South on McKenzie Avenue travelling across Hwy 1 at the McKenzie Interchange. Prior to intersection the left and right lane both have a painted straight arrow. Once drivers are past the Hwy 1 westbound lanes the left lane becomes a left turn only and the right lane is straight only. Many drivers use the left lane to jump the queue or are unaware the left lane must turn the left and thus need to merge right mid intersection causing close calls and angry drivers. I suggest that the left lane requires painted signage before the interchange saying “Left lane must turn left” I am sure flaggers can confirm the many close calls they witness day and night. Thank you

    • tranbceditor on October 1, 2018 at 10:47 am

      Thank you for this comment and observation Ian! We have sent it forward to the Project Manager for review.

    • tranbceditor on October 2, 2018 at 1:20 pm

      Hello Ian,

      We received word back from the project manager that the project team is aware of the concern raised and working with the contractor and ministry traffic engineers to make improvements to the road marking and signage for the project site.

  17. Nick Thomas on September 26, 2018 at 6:28 am

    Does the Ministry think it is appropriate for the major heavy transport route to the rest of Canada to pass through communities as if it was just a minor route?

    Recently in Sicamous a mobility scooter was hit by a semi on a stretch of the Trans-Canada highway with no sidewalks. This is a stretch that has several businesses, including Tim Hortons, that have no pedestrian access from the rest of town except along or across the highway. In Sorrento it is even worse – cut in half by the highway.

    Does the Ministry have any plans to upgrade these sections of the highway to a suitable standard for a major trunk route in the foreseeable future?

    • tranbceditor on September 27, 2018 at 10:03 am

      Good morning Nick,

      Thank you for your comment. We shared your concern with the local area manager who us with the information below. Neither the Ministry of Transportation nor our maintenance contractors were informed of this incident, likely because it did not require a lane closure or traffic control.

      It is the nature of development to have transport routes to pass through communities on highways such as the Trans-Canada. Measures have been taken to balance the needs of the residents of these communities and the traffic passing through.

      We are aware of issues with pedestrians crossing near the Tim Horton’s in Sicamous. There are currently no parking signs in this section of the TCH to prevent semis from parking on the wide shoulder. We are looking at the possibility of placing barrier here to prevent large trucks from taking up the shoulder, blocking sight distance, and crossing to walk into the Tim Horton’s area. As this is on the outskirts of Sicamous and not a very urban area, there is no sidewalk here.

      The section of the TCH around Sorrento also has a lowered speed limit, with the addition of crosswalks and sidewalks for use by pedestrians in this area. There are no upgrades planned here.

      These areas continue to be monitored and if improvements are warranted they are implemented. We hope that this helps answer some of your concerns.

    • tranbceditor on September 28, 2018 at 12:44 pm

      Hello again Nick,

      The ministry and the maintenance contractor were made aware of this incident after the fact. After emergency services responded, our maintenance contractor called a traffic control company in while BC Hydro worked. Damage was restricted to a hydro pole off the Sicamous Frontage Road and not the highway barrier as the article indicates, there is no damage to highway infrastructure resulting form this incident. We hope that this helps clarify.

      • Ian W on October 2, 2018 at 12:49 pm

        I don’t think the subsequent response helps clarify anything. One can only conclude you were initially misinformed regarding the incident and lane closure, as the photographic evidence supports a closure. The article states, “semi pushed the scooter into a concrete barrier before driving into a hydro pole, sheering the pole off in the process”. Thus you could be correct, the impacted barrier may have suffered no damage, while the pole that’s in the median between the highway and Frontage Road was sheared off. Your response suggests you are only concerned about damage to MOTI assets. A person died there as a result of a vehicle leaving the highway. That’s implicitly a highway safety problem.

        According to Google StreetView, there are no marked crosswalks along the highway. StreetView shows a person walking unprotected along the highway shoulder. There appear to be no marked pedestrian crossings. There are no sidewalks. There are no barriers along the curb. The only barriers (2 sets – is that a problem spot ?) are directly opposite the T intersection. The island at the Tim Horton’s exit is positioned to permit through traffic along the shoulder in that area. The signage is “NO Stopping”, not “NO Parking” (so, good). There appear to no signs on the opposite shoulder where there are four semi units shown parked on the opposite shoulder (and more in prior year perspectives)! Seems to be a long-term problem and a lack of enforcement of various laws.

        How about placing a marked crosswalk with pedestrian activated flashing overhead lights and appropriate warning signage at the West side of Rauna Rd? Open a gap in the barrier on the South side with a pedestrian path to Frontage Rd. That at least provides a suggestion that’s where pedestrians should be. Encourage Sicamous to make a safe walking path along the South of Frontage to discourage walking on the highway. Either erect “NO Stopping” signs in BOTH directions, or create a proper EB pull-out to allow to vehicles to stop safely off the shoulder; the right of way is wide enough to support that.

        • tranbceditor on October 4, 2018 at 3:17 pm

          Hi Ian – we appreciate your concern. We reached out again for further clarification and here’s what we heard back from the local area manager.

          All collision data is retained and reviewed as a method of assessing if improvements are required. There is an existing pedestrian-activated crosswalk at the junction of Highway 1 and 97A. There are no sidewalks in this industrial area of Sicamous on the highway or on the municipality’s frontage roads. We are in the process of installing additional parking signs in this section to increase the safety of the highway for all users. Trucks have the option of using the nearby Husky truck stop to safely maneuver and purchase food or coffee. Crosswalks, especially pedestrian activated, are not installed lightly. Traffic engineers must look at many factors and obtain data to ensure warrants are met for consistent application. The same goes for barriers as these also require warrants and design. Traffic engineers are aware of this area and this file is under review.

          We hope that this helps!

  18. Ryan Koch on September 24, 2018 at 2:56 pm

    Is it okay for a Construction company to be digging up the slope on the south side of Peachland BC without Traffic flaggers? The trucks are backing out into traffic and creating delays.

    • tranbceditor on September 25, 2018 at 9:21 am

      Hi Ryan – thanks for connecting with us and sharing your concern. To confirm this is on BC Highway 97?

  19. Doreen on September 21, 2018 at 5:24 pm

    When are the lines on the Pender Islands going to be painted?

    • tranbceditor on September 24, 2018 at 10:22 am

      Good morning Doreen,

      We are looking into this for you. Stay tuned!

    • tranbceditor on September 24, 2018 at 10:48 am

      Hello again Doreen,

      Our area manager has let us know that line painting is scheduled for Galiano and Pender Islands during the first two weeks of October.

  20. Sean on September 20, 2018 at 6:11 pm

    Hey when are the new street lights on highway 14 going to be turned on? Humpback through to Sooke.

    • tranbceditor on September 24, 2018 at 10:19 am

      Hi Sean – we are looking into this for you. Stay tuned.

    • tranbceditor on October 9, 2018 at 4:54 pm

      Hello again Sean – sorry for the delay in getting you this response. BC Hydro is scheduled to be connecting most, if not all, of the new services by October 19. Thanks for connecting with us here, we hope this helps!

  21. Jeff Brisbin on September 20, 2018 at 1:08 pm

    I drive Hwy 1 from BC to Ab twice a week and have noticed that road lines have not been painted in numerous spot, especially from Revelstoke to Golden. Now that the wet weather and snow are making a visit, that stretch is very dangerous, especially at night. That stretch is very dark and without road lines you can hardly see where the edge of the road is and where the center of the road is. I feel there will be a very serious accident here soon. Some of these areas have been paved now for 6 weeks and no lines painted. Please paint lines before someone gets killed.

    Concerned Trucker.

    • tranbceditor on September 24, 2018 at 10:08 am

      Hello and thank you for your comment. We have shared it with our local area manager who has noted your concern.

      The contractor working on this project has been plagued by delays due to weather and other events. As a result, the work has taken longer than anticipated. While temporary pavement markings have been applied on the top lift of the new pavement and in areas that have been milled down, areas that have received a level course of new asphalt (but will still have asphalt applied on top) may not have received temporary lane markings.

      The construction speed limit has been set at 80km/hr maximum, with subsequent reductions to 60km/hr and 50km/hr where applicable. This is to account for the condition of the road (shoulder drops, missing lane markings, altered traffic patterns, milled surface) and the effects of reduced visibility due to inclement conditions. We urge all motorists to observe these construction speed limits (most do not – commercial or private vehicles) and reduce speed according to the conditions (wet roads, foggy, etc).

      That said, the area manager will follow up with the ministry representative on the project to determine if more temporary lane markings can be applied to improve the visibility. The paving contractor has not scheduled line marking painting until the placement of all of the new pavement is complete, and this is tentatively scheduled for early October. Please let us know if you have any other questions.

  22. Andrew Smith on September 18, 2018 at 3:16 pm

    I was driving the Coquihalla on Sept 17th 2018 around 2:00 pm towards Vancouver just before Hope and there were trucks painting the white line on the right side of the road. There were at least two trucks moving drivers to the next lane and one painting a white line. Unfortunately this paint is now all over the side of my vehicle (and probably several others). My question is how do I find out what company was used to paint the lines on the highway at this time in that area. Please let me know as I have filed a claim with ICBC and they are keen to know the name of the company. Thanks, Andrew.

    • tranbceditor on September 19, 2018 at 10:22 am

      Good morning Andrew,

      Please contact our maintenance contractor, Emil Anderson Maintenance Co. Ltd. at 1-800-667-5122

  23. Poogz on September 11, 2018 at 9:36 am

    Hi,
    We’re planning to drive from Edmonton to Surrey on Sept 13th and just wanted to know how the road conditions are. We plan to leave Edmonton at 5am, stop by at Lake Louise, take the Icefields Parkway route to Jasper then head to Surrey. We’ll be driving back to Edmonton on Sept 16th and would need advise on the road conditions that time as well.

    Thanks and more power to your helpful team.

    • tranbceditor on September 11, 2018 at 2:09 pm

      Hello Poogz,

      Thanks for connecting with us here. At this time there are no wildfires impacting travel on your proposed route; however, given the unpredictable nature of wildfire, we encourage you to check our traveller information system, DriveBC.ca before you go to get a better sense of the current conditions on the roads. DriveBC is updated 24/7 and is your best source of information. We’ve put together a video to help you navigate DriveBC.ca to identify road closures and condition information on your chosen route. https://youtu.be/SXgWdiGNVdU

      Give yourself plenty of time and remember to pack warm clothes and extra food in case you are stopped in the mountains unexpectedly. Thanks for connecting with us here!

  24. Thomas G Johnson on September 10, 2018 at 7:41 pm

    In your section on why signalling in roundabouts is important you state “turning left? flick on the left turn signal” This is incorrect. The only signal you need is when you exit you signal left. Can you correct this please. I have tried to teach people this who live in the neighbourhood where one is situated, and someone manages to find this site and quote it as the proper thing to do.

    Thanks.

    • tranbceditor on September 11, 2018 at 2:20 pm

      Hello Thomas – thanks for your comment.

      The BC Motor Vehicle Act is essentially the authoritative guide on driving; however, signalling in roundabouts is not specifically covered.

      Relevant sections include:
      Section 170 states:
      (1) If traffic may be affected by turning a vehicle, a person must not turn it without giving the appropriate signal under sections 171 and 172.
      (2) If a signal of intention to turn right or left is required, a driver must give it continuously for sufficient distance before making the turn to warn traffic.
      (3) If there is an opportunity to give a signal, a driver must not stop or suddenly decrease the speed of a vehicle without first giving the appropriate signal under sections 171 and 172.
      Meanwhile, Section 150 (3) states:
      (3) The driver of a vehicle passing around a rotary traffic island must drive the vehicle to the right of the island.
      We have discussed appropriate roundabout signalling with ICBC. We agree signalling right before exiting the roundabout is important.

      Our traffic safety engineers’ interpretation of the MVA, as it relates to signalling in roundabouts, views a roundabout similar to a four-way intersection, and maintains there is an added benefit to letting other drivers know the intended exit, even prior to approaching that exit. This view is shared by other countries, such as the UK, and it is our recommendation.

      That said, it would be a victory in itself if drivers at least signalled right before exiting roundabouts. We produced the video/blog because we see many drivers do not signal at all – whether entering or exiting – roundabouts.

  25. shelley on September 10, 2018 at 6:27 pm

    I was just caught up in the malahat closure this morning. I arrived at the goldstream “stoppage” and was directed to turn around and head back to the city. Everyone was. My problem is not that there was a road closure … but was what to do now. I was heading to my home in the comox valley. Where can you go to find out how to get up island … what are the local radio stations … when is the closure over … have a cell, but not with data … so … what to do? There are lots of signs about how full the ferries are … and when they leave but nothing for us going up island. This is the thing that I was the most frustrated about. I headed for the Mill Bay ferry .. we landed in mill bay at 1:30 and the captain told us the malahat had been opened since 1130. Come on. How was I suposed to find this out? By 1:30, if I had known the highway was open again, I could have been half way home (and not out $22.50 for the ferry) I got home at 5:15. It took me 9 hours to get from victoria to comox.

    • tranbceditor on September 11, 2018 at 1:45 pm

      Hi Shelley – thanks for letting us know. We shared your concern with the local area manager who informed us that the ministry is in the process of installing flip down signs in the Duncan area to notify travellers that the detour is in effect. He also informed us that the City of Langford will be installing LCD signs along the highway corridors to communicate closure and detour messaging. We suggested that each of these types of messages boards instruct travellers to check DriveBC.ca or local radio for more information. He confirmed that BC Ferries does not have staff or any other kind of information system at the Mill Bay route terminals – so the only way for them to communicate would be via their online/social media channels. We hope that this helps! Thank you for sharing your concern with us – we appreciate how frustrating it is to be delayed. We are working to find better ways to communicate any delays with you during future incidents.

  26. Gil Ashdown on September 10, 2018 at 12:39 pm

    My wife and I where returning home from up country on Hwy. 97 Fraser Canyon route at night while it was raining. I’m surprised in this day and age we have not yet come up with a solution of a better reflective road paint that you can see during the rainy nights. We did notice some portions of the hwy.
    had upright posts with white reflective backing that helped to see the edge of the road, but in most areas where too far apart. It’s been pure luck that more vehicles have not driven off the edge. A couple of times found myself in the wrong lane. Years ago the reflective quality of paint was three time what it is today. If “cat eyes” where installed and positioned so not to come out after snow plowing they could be a huge life saving improvement.

    • tranbceditor on September 11, 2018 at 2:59 pm

      Hello Gil – thanks for your comment.
      Highly visible lines make it easy for drivers to see where their vehicle needs to be, and good lane and road edge markings guide traffic and make our roads safer for everyone. Every year, our contractors repaint more than 30,000 line kilometres throughout the province, so the testing could potentially have a widespread effect across BC.
      Environmental regulation changes in 2010 have meant a move away from more resilient acrylic paints we used in the past, to waterborne latex paints that are less harmful to the environment. These paints are less durable than previous paints and we are working with paint manufacturers on solutions to the issue.
      The ministry occasionally applies other products like inlaid durable thermoplastics, which are installed on the road surface or slightly recessed into the pavement. However, these materials can be up to eight times the cost of paint. As much as we would love to use this product, we must also function under a tight fiscal budget.
      We have recently announced a paint formula which appears to stand up to our tough climate and will be applying that paint across the province starting this summer. Here’s a link for more.

      https://www.tranbc.ca/2017/04/04/pavement-paint-promising-for-lasting-brightness/

  27. Katie on September 3, 2018 at 8:02 pm

    Why don’t all the bridges in the lower mainland have suicide barriers?

    I see that the Alex Fraser in particular is bad for this, but it’t not listed as one of the improvements.

    • tranbceditor on September 6, 2018 at 12:21 pm

      Hi Katie
      Thank you for your comment.
      • We have focussed our suicide prevention efforts in the Lower Mainland on our bridges with high pedestrian traffic (we are responsible specifically for the Lions Gate, Alex Fraser, Port Mann and the Ironworkers Memorial).
      • The Ironworkers Memorial Bridge has a three-metre high safety fence installed on both sides.

      • Highly visible emergency call boxes have been installed on the Alex Fraser, Port Mann, Lions Gate and Ironworkers Memorial Bridges. These boxes connect to an operator 24/7 should a person be in crisis and have proven to be effective in preventing suicides.

      • Unfortunately, the Lions Gate Bridge cannot accommodate the additional wind loading from suicide barriers and changing the design of a cable stay bridge such as the Alex Fraser or Port Mann Bridge to accommodate barriers would be overly complex due to their sensitivity to wind loads. Any change in a bridge’s profile, such as a new fence, can influence how the bridge performs in wind.
      • Our bridges are monitored by cameras and patrolled 24 hours a day.
      • We work closely with emergency responders to avert incidents and continue to work collaboratively with local enforcement agencies, local crisis management centres and other key stakeholders to ensure we are doing everything we can to address suicide prevention.

      We hope that this helps answer your questions. If you have any other comments or concerns, we’d be happy to help.

  28. Ed on September 2, 2018 at 7:55 pm

    I am very concerned about overly bright headlights and glare. In particular many light duty trucks many light trucks have been lifted or sink in the back end under even a light load (or with tidy tanks). Other trucks have had ultra bright lights installed at the factory or in the after market.
    I realize these lights are great for the vehicle operator, however they are incredibly dangerous for oncoming traffic, especially cars. You can easily be blinded for seconds after passing and see spots even longer.

    • tranbceditor on September 4, 2018 at 3:59 pm

      Hello Ed – thanks for posting your concern here. Unfortunately, the BC MVA doesn’t speak specifically to luminosity of headlamps, only to the positioning of them. Vehicles manufactured and made for sale in Canada must meet Transport Canada laws and regulations. Transport Canada is currently reviewing many aspects of vehicle lighting, which you can read more about here: http://www.gazette.gc.ca/rp-pr/p1/2016/2016-02-27/html/reg2-eng.html

      We hope that this helps!

  29. Ian W on September 1, 2018 at 3:45 pm

    On 2018-08-31, There was a most entertaining piece on CTV News about the worst bus stop in North America (https://bc.ctvnews.ca/video?clipId=1477377), located on Lougheed Highway and Old Dewdney Trunk Road in Pitt Meadows (https://goo.gl/maps/sEqdUnwEdPU2).

    Apparently it’s land is owned by the B.C. government and that it’s been asking the province to makes improvements to the stop. The Ministry of Transportation said in a statement it is “discussing possible options to improve safety with TransLink.”

    There is a trivial improvement which would contribute immensely to public safety. Why not just put a break in the median and flare the barrier out, allowing at grade access to the stop? It’s simple and it’s safe. It should take a crew less than an hour to reconfigure. You and Translink can then take your sweet time discussing long term options.

    Not sure what I’m taking about? See what’s been done for the fire hydrants along the Low Level Road in North Vancouver (https://goo.gl/maps/iDDjXsBPGMP2). Quick responses and solutions also earn great kudos for the responsible organizations. Don’t make us the laughing stock of North America.

    “Enjoy the long weekend”.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.